On Aug 10, 2008, at 2:40 AM, Eric Chatonet wrote:

Bonjour Tereza,

Brilliant :-)



Avec plasir!

Replacing " of " with comma is an utterly reliable method. As a programmer whose first professional work was in assembler, I'm always looking for efficient-appearing* ways to script common operations.

Speaking in the general area of object-hierarchy traversal, I almost convinced Mark Waddingham in Las Vegas to consider a new keyword: "my"

In any script, "my stack" would refer to the stack in which the script's object lives. Same with "my group". Seems to me to be very handy for scripts that would run while the default stack is set to different stack as, for example, in dialogs. I often end up putting any handler of substance in group or card or stack scripts so that I can use "of me" to refer to local objects. I might change my programming practice if I had an easy-to-type and semantically transparent way that didn't require parsing "the long id of me" just to affect the contents of an adjacent control!


t


* I say 'efficient-appearing' because who knows what is going on under the hood?





--
Tereza Snyder
Califex Software, Inc.


_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to