David, Not only Kens XML Lib can handle those, but it also comes with RSS routines :-D
stsXMLLib is slower than revXML, but it can handle namespaces and unicoded content, so I think it's a good option for parsing ATOM Feeds. Cheers andre PS: who is secretly working on some atom routines too On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 6:10 AM, David Bovill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK. I have not yet had to pay much attention to these XML DTD / name space > issues - so help me out on this. AFAIK the name space is defined in the > header of the XML, i this case the standard Atom header: > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"; xmlns:content=" > http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"; xmlns:wfw=" > http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"; xmlns:rdf=" > http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"; xmlns:dc=" > http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"; xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/";> > > So my guess is that this would work in Rev if i tell the external how to > interpret the name spaces by pointin it to the DTD. however changeing the > revXmlcreateTree function to be strict and not ignore badly formed XML makes > no odds - and there does not sseem to be a way of hooking the external up to > the external DTDs other than a simple check. > > 2008/8/29 Malte Brill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> While this is inconvenient behaviour, it might be argued that it is >> correct, or at least standard compliant. ;-) > > > This is a standard Atom feed - the XML name spaces are defined in the > headers with valid DTDs - or am I missing something? > > >> There are XML libraries for other environments, that handle the 1st case >> exactly the way rev does, others do not lose the namespace. As far as I can >> tell version 2 is W3C compliant while version 1 is not. A bug in Revs >> external? Not sure about that but eager to hear other opinions. > > > I am not really able to comment on this knowledgeably. I'd be pretty > confident it is all standards compliant - but that is relying on the source > and my scattered reading around XML DTDs. From a user point of view - you > want to make it as easy as possible to parse the most common XML feeds out > here. It looks bad if it breaks with Atom feeds, and bad = bug in my > language. > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > -- http://www.andregarzia.com All We Do Is Code. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
