Kay C Lan wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:21 AM, Mark Swindell <[email protected]>wrote:
Must one remove modern features to build backwards functionality?
I would have thought that would have been a given. I'd have also thought
that Rev would have warned you if you tried to use 3.0 features in a Legacy
format. Don't know, haven't ventured down that path.
It doesn't. I was embarrassed once to enter a bug report into the QCC
reporting that a feature didn't work. Mark responded that I'd saved the
stack in legacy format and used 3.0 features in it. I felt so dumb.
I believe the "save" command just uses the system API and does a blind
write operation, the same as any other binary file.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [email protected]
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution