Robert Brenstein wrote: > No, I do not want open general scripting and I don't see how one can > easily make an alternative authoring tool. If a do is executed within > a context of my handler, not everything will run. In this specific > project I would parse user input anyway to make sure it meets my > requirements, so I could check for any illegal calls, but I'd want to > use do for efficiency of execution (data is read separately so it is > not a concern here).
I'll bet there's a way to do it in Rev (if you'll pardon the pun), script limits and all. In some ways it's a lot like the non-asynch mouse messages: for a while there was a lot of talk that handlers dependent on polling mouse evebnts were impossible to rewrite using mouseMove, but with a little help from others on this list such handlers were rewritten and people moved forward with their work. While not likely to be a one-liner, my hunch is there's no project authored in HC that can't be at least as useful authored in Rev. -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Media Corporation Developer of WebMerge 2.2: Publish any database on any site ___________________________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com Tel: 323-225-3717 AIM: FourthWorldInc _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
