********** > Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 15:38:38 -0800 > Subject: Re: If this is a feature, it's a nasty one. > From: Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Victor Eijkhout wrote: > >> but I want to use logical sounding names. ---------- > A function named "t" with a parameter named "a" makes their use > self-evident? ---------- No kiddin'...what if there was a need to debug or update in 4 or 5 months after writing a few thousand lines of code elsewhere? How on earth could you tell what they represent? ---------snip > You'll find your code working well -- and possibly easier to read and > maintain -- using these popular naming conventions for variables and > parameters:
<http://www.fourthworld.com/embassy/articles/scriptstyle.html> ---------- Agreed. I probably do a few things differently (e.g., if counting through objects I use bNum for buttons, lNum for lines, etc.), but they still make sense (and would to most). Whenever someone asks me about scripting conventions I send them there. I'm personally grateful you have that site, Richard, and keep it updated. Best regards, Ken N. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
