Mark Wieder wrote: > OK - I think I see what you're doing. If I just put that into a script > then I can compile it with or without strict compilation mode. But > then there's nothing to execute. I'm not really clear on what is > getting compiled at that point. I think as far as the compiler is > concerned there's no code to run, so there's nothing to compile.
You are correct Mark. The errant code has to be in a handler inside of a script to get the error. Outside a handler in a script, it's not executable, and is therefore not compiled because the whole block, with the exception of the local declaration, which would become a script local, is meaningless. I tested this way and got the same result of no compile error. ;-) Aloha from Hawaii, Jim Bufalini _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
