On May 21, 2009, at 10:52 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
Devin Asay wrote:
On May 18, 2009, at 11:24 PM, Kay C Lan wrote:
What about the delay going from the U.S. and back?
What's the latency?
Hah! Try being in Australia before complaining about latency!!!
Come on, you know full well that Oz is a day ahead of the US. Even
your own
on-Rev site, at the bottom, shows that your time is 15 hrs ahead of
Texas
time, so it can't be latency because your messages arrive at your
computer
before they've even arrived at the Texas servers. I assume it's
difficult
sending your messages 'back to the future'.
There is a simple explanation. Sarah obviously has ported Jacque's
Time
Warp stack to on-rev.
Yeah, but she only figured out the part that goes backward.
No, it's just a limitation of the web. HTTP is read-only and temporal-
past-only. We'll have to wait for the next version of the HTTP
protocol to get temporal-future capability. It's just one more
advantage of the Rev desktop environment. :-)
Devin
Devin Asay
Humanities Technology and Research Support Center
Brigham Young University
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
