Bill, Bill Marriott wrote: > > I believe I've corrected the error
that is a mighty fine piece of code. Beats me in all 3 images. It's assuring that we find the same number of differing pixels. :) I wonder if anybody can improve on that? regards Bernd -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Inefficient-code-tp24226458p24261535.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
