On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Randall Reetz<[email protected]> wrote: > What part of the set do you say is not a machine or was not considered a > machine at the time it was coded. What assumptions are you making about what > I am asking for? What fears are driving your angry and hyper-protective > stance? What nuts and bolts does my suggestion endanger? I have put my > suggestions and the reasons for them openly on the table. Your turn.
However, I have stated my view point and I can see I am not going to change yours, so we must agree to differ. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
