I have looked over the actual thread and the order of the posts.  I never 
criticized any posts or poster.  I only offered my suggestions.  Only after I 
have been attacked have I attempted a defense of my ideas or questions the 
motives of those who have attacked me...  The order of events matters.  
Fairness matters.  Substance matters.

To answer the one questions you have asked:

Most words in a natural language are synonyms to other words (with subtle 
variation of context or meaning).  When words are grouped with their synonym 
cousins, a dimensionallity frequently appears that defines a range of general 
to specific.  Sprint is a specific form of run which is a specific form of 
locomotion which is a specific form of motion which is more specific than the 
most general word in this chain, move.  Having access to an anthology that 
associates words into these overlapping chains of specificity is a 
fantastically rich resource for the automated derivation of meaning (semantic 
processing).  Creating such a beast, at the user level is prohibitive to all 
but the most driven (insane) amongst us.  Doing it once at the tool level so 
that all can profit... That is a reasonable goal.

randall

-----Original Message-----
From: Randall Reetz <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 11:15 AM
To: How to use Revolution <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Syllabic division of words

Wow, I am intimately and directly involved on a daily and hourly actual 
productive labor towards these goals.  The assumptions you make without asking 
are sad.  I have dedicated my life to these goals.  I write code every day 
exactly towards these goals.  I advise corporations and startups on semantic 
technology and applying evolution to software and processing.  I have 
conversations with doug engelbart and others like him frequently.  But ideas 
don't have to be attacked as some of you seem driven to do.  Especially ideas 
as well thought through and defined as mine.  I can't remember ever reading a 
list like this and cultivating as some of you seem to be, for the opportunity 
to disqualify anything suggested that might present actual fodder for 
significant progress.  No tool no matter how perfect means much if it is 
available only to the few and the privileged.  Everything hypercard offered 
could be programmed in pascal or c or some data base api.  What set it apart 
was the way it offered these functions to the average joe.  But twenty five 
years have passed.  Much has changed.  Has xtalk kept up?

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Yennie <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 10:04 AM
To: How to use Revolution <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Syllabic division of words

Randall,

You seem to have a great thirst for striking down the state of  
technology, without actually contributing much to it, nor (as far as I  
can tell) understanding much about it. Here's an idea -- how about  
just discussing your ideas instead of chastising anyone who fails to  
grasp your genius?

Do you get upset about the lack of flying cars every time you change a  
tire, and call out engineers as afraid of innovation?

I have no idea what "hierarchical thesaurus semantic chains" are. Can  
you explain why I should want them in my development environment and  
give a concrete example? Or are you, as I suspect, just throwing  
around buzz words and condescension?

This is about how I react to your descriptions:
http://blogmaverick.com/2009/08/19/success-motivation-what-entrepreneurs-should-not-do/

I see lots of words and claims, but nary one little example of what  
you are actually trying to say.

> What would it take to scare a bunch of computers jockeys?  Not  
> much.  Innovation?  You don't get on top of everest in one leap.   
> And you don't wait around for miracles if you want to move up a  
> hill.  Nobody is asking for perfection or completion here.  Just  
> some baby steps.  Phonemic and phrase chunking isn't exactly rocket  
> science.  But it is if you expect it to be pulled of at the scale of  
> user level scripting.  Hierarchical thesaurus semantic chains would  
> be a fairly simple addition as well.  Oh well.  I have been well  
> whipped for speaking out for what WILL matter.  God forbid  we go  
> there first.  Scared, controlling, and mean spirited.  That is  
> exactly what I have come to expect of geeks.  Sad.

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to