And still you have not outlined your wishlist for future xtalk improvements. Which is weird because there is at least one less person who will jump all over your ideas.
-----Original Message----- From: Sarah Reichelt <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 4:33 PM To: How to use Revolution <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Syllabic division of words On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Randall Reetz<[email protected]> wrote: > You didn't state anything of your views. All you have done is publicly > shamed mine. So I am asking you to tell us all what improvements to xtalk do > you want and how my suggestions (or those of any other poor sap brave enough > to out an opinion) so threaten your agenda or sensibilities. What an absolutely astonishing thing for you to say. As far as I am concerned you just lost all your credibility since you haven't even done me the courtesy of reading my posts. So you are allowed to complain about us and accuse us of being "provincial", "angry", "hyper-protective" etc. But as soon as anyone puts forward an alternative view point, that is publicly shaming you? It is apparently not possible to have a rational discussion with you, so I give up at this point. Hopefully Heather will step in at some point and put an end to this pointless and increasingly irritating discussion. Sarah _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
