Hello,

After not really using Rev for 3 years and finding myself with time on my hands, I decided to get reacquainted.

So, I'm taking little baby steps, trying to remember what little I knew three years ago.

I'm trying to do a timed presentation of images onscreen, so I end up with 45 lines of script in which pretty much every other line is a wait statement (do something, wait, do something, wait).

Someone suggested I break the handler up into a bunch of little sub-handlers and use send in time and, remembering the oft-repeated list admonition to do this, I sat down to think about it.

But I don't get it. This will result in a script that's orders of magnitude larger as each showing will need to have its own subhandler for the sending in time.

If I'm the only person running the stack in the IDE, is there any other benefit to be gained by adding all those additional lines other than not locking up the IDE when running the stack there? Is there some better way to do it?

Kindest thanks,

Judy
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to