Thank you, Sarah. So, do I have this properly?:
If I used my brain and came up with an intelligent naming system for my images I could use a loop, but, I didn't and so I won't;
It's not a slideshow, so that's out; and, that leaves Use wait with messages... think I'll go with that! Thank you again! Judy On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Sarah Reichelt wrote:
if you use "wait with messages", then it won't be too bad, as the interface will not appear to be frozen i.e. the window can be moved around the screen etc. Resizing will not work as the resizeStack message will not be sent until after your loop. The "send in time" method can be done in a couple of ways. You can have a series of handlers, with the last line of each doing the send in time. Or you can have a single handler with a script local or global containing a counter. The handle could check the value of this counter, so something based on the value, increment the counter, then "send in time" back to the original handler. However, if this is just a slideshow type thing, how about putting each image on a new card, and using a handler like this: command nextSlide go next card send "nextSlide" to me in 10 seconds end nextSlide Any additional scripting needed could be in the preOpenCard or openCard handler for each card.
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
