Hello, I'd say that it is the third way to "resolve" some bugs.
The first one is to say "we are working on it", making promises about a release and then never release anything. The second is just to let bugs in an "unconfirmed" status even if they are trivial to replicate. These are the 2 ways to "resolve" some bugs that I've learned from RunRev. Too bad to some time manage things that way when the product is really good. Best, ÉrIC Le 10 nov. 2009 à 20:01, Richmond Mathewson a écrit : > > Well; speaking as somebody who is fairly cheesed-off > from finding that the non-ability of Unicode fonts to > work properly with revlets has effectively damaged > his proposed web-release completely > > [ watch this space for a downloadable standalone shortly ] > > I wonder what will mysteriously have been removed > this time. > > I for one have learnt a valuable lesson from recent events > and will try to remember to emulate them: > > If you have a bug delete that capability completely > instead of making an effort to sort it out. > > I really wonder . . . > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > -- My NeXT computer will Be a Mac too! -- _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
