Peter W A Wood wrote:
Richmond
Ideally I would like, eventually, to have a successful, web-based
client so that
end-users can "do their Sanskrit" without having to clutter up their
hard disks
(or their employers) with a standalone.
Is a stand-alone really that much more clutter than the plug-in and
the revlet? Surely, they're about the same size, just stored in
different places on the users' hard disks.
A very good point. The only disadvantage about the latter is that the
end-user
actually has to download the standalone and decide where to put it and
generally spend more time on "meta" things.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
