Bill Marriott <[email protected]> wrote: > It's not that we find the Player to be adding so much functionality; nothing > to do with business model per se. It's that the revWeb plugin is essentially > the new "Player." Better to focus on having one piece of software end users > would install to "play" stacks than two. For one thing, it's one less code > base to maintain. For another, when we flesh out the mechanics of hosting > revlets within system windows, you would theoretically be able to > double-click a revlet and have it open much like it did in the old Player.
OKay :-) Sure, to have a Player + to download a stack was the "old" solution... not to mention the platform problem: revlets run equally (IMHO) in all platforms, since there is nothing to "download", as they run in a web page. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
