James Hurley wrote:

Things I didn't know:

1)  I thought I would be saving to a substack.

Substacks -- the ones embedded into a main stack -- become part of the standalone. Executables can't save data to themselves, no matter how many stacks they are composed of. So yeah, you need separate stacks on disk if you want to save them.

2)  I was unaware of the "shutDownRequest" handler.

Another question or two.

1)  How would  "StackRunner" differ from using my own splash screen?
2)  How would "Revolution Player" differ from using my own splash screen?

I don't think either of these would be much different. They are both basically splash standalones, though Rev's player has a few more restrictions I think. But with either of these, you'd need to put your saving instructions into each satellite stack, or else into a backscript that you insert when your first stack opens. That's because both of these are already built standalones, so to add any scripted behavior you have to use another stack to store the scripts in.

3) If I use "save" verses "save as..." can I assume that the satellite stack will be saved and the user will not be asked if he or she wants to overwrite the existing file?

Yes. Actually, you can use "save as" too without bothering the user. Both "save stack" and "save stack as <filepath>" just write a file to disk. No dialog is presented unless your script puts one up.

--
Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     [email protected]
HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to