On 17/01/2010 21:16, Bruce Robertson wrote:
On Jan 17, 2010, at 11:06 AM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
I myself, have a large number of computers rotting in my attic in Scotland
(about 5 Performa 52xx
Macs) which are perfectly serviceable, except for the fact that it would be
JOLLY NICE to leverage
features implemented in RunRevs 3.5 and 4 on Mac OS 8.1 . . . I am seriously
tempted to cart them
to Bulgaria this coming summer (when I will be driving to Scotland and back) as
I may be moving into
bigger school premises where I could easily accommodate 5 or 6 machines. I also
have been offered
the opportunity to get my hands on a half-dozen G3 slot-loading iMacs that are
being 'deprecated' at
an educational institution in Scotland - they will cope with Mac OS X 10.4.9
but will run far more
efficiently on 9.1.
And I am quite sure that I am not the only "retro nutter" out there.
And the incentive here for RunRev is
what?_______________________________________________
Probably nothing; but there seems to be no downside for them either.
If you come to my house and ask me for the 3 chairs that are stored in
the cellar because
I no longer need them you are welcome to them: doesn't really benefit
me, doesn't hurt
me either - but if you can use the chairs, that's super.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
