But adopted by some for that very tie-in reason. It would be a shame to for this sort of rationale to result in turning Hypercard into the old, fuddy-duddy grandfather we're ashamed of ocknowledging in public...
:( Judy On Fri, 30 May 2003, J. Landman Gay wrote: > On 5/30/03 11:19 AM, Danny Grizzle wrote: > > > I would be careful about tying Revolution too closely to HyperCard. > > > > HyperCard is Apple-centric, and a failed product. Revolution needs to stand > > on its own merit; the HyperCard tie-in will only serve to have it dismissed > > out of hand by Windows/Linux/Unix users. > > And by some Mac users as well. > > -- > Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com > > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
