Judy Perry writes:

But adopted by some for that very tie-in reason.

It would be a shame to for this sort of rationale to result in turning
Hypercard into the old, fuddy-duddy grandfather we're ashamed of
ocknowledging in public...


:(

Judy

On Fri, 30 May 2003, J. Landman Gay wrote:

On 5/30/03 11:19 AM, Danny Grizzle wrote:

> I would be careful about tying Revolution too closely to HyperCard.
>
> HyperCard is Apple-centric, and a failed product. Revolution needs to stand
> on its own merit; the HyperCard tie-in will only serve to have it dismissed
> out of hand by Windows/Linux/Unix users.


And by some Mac users as well.

--
Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===========
Like most things one tries to sell, packaging is used to appeal to target markets. So, who is the market? Win/'Nix users? Mac users? All of the above? Keeping the target in mind during writing, and especially during the marketing phase, will tend to temper the HyperCard tie-in appropriately.


miscdas
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to