I guess the upshot of this whole discussion is that everything is a tradeoff. 
To gain stability we have to lose some freedom. The most stable government is a 
dictatorship, where only one man's wishes are done and everyone complies with 
the standard he issues. But of course, nobody wants that. Excepting the 
dictator of course. :-)

Same thing with software and operating systems. People have complained against 
the rigid control Apple maintains on development of their operating systems 
(Microsoft is no different) and hardware, but the end result is stability and 
predictability (not perfection I know). So it's all about balance. How much 
freedom are we willing to give up for stability and predictability in our 
computing world? The answer is different for every person. 

For me, and IT guy, I am willing to give up a LOT of freedom, and restrict the 
freedom of my users, so that my job does not become orders of magnitude more 
complex and overwhelming. For the guy whose computer is his own personal 
digital erector set, he will give up very little freedom. 

For me, I am willing to go with the OS that the most developers will tackle, 
because they know it's not a moving target. I am rewarded with software like 
Runtime Revolution. But the erector set guy has to face the likelihood that 
mainstream software is not going to be available for his system. He will have 
to choose from the offerings of other erector set guys (and very talented and 
productive ones I admit.) 

Bob


On Feb 2, 2010, at 4:26 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:

> But please remember that one man's limitations is another man's freedom.  For 
> an experienced user like yourself Ubuntu's less frequent updates isn't 
> helpful.  But for newbies, updating every day is a hassle. And for 
> developers, less frequent releases means the platform is less of a moving 
> target.

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to