Thanks Scott. The clock face is certainly the most familiar for users
and does take up less real estate. I haven't entirely discounted it
but I feel it doesn't lend itself very well to time entry on a
computer. It really needs two hands for it to be the familiar clock
face we're all used to (which I'm guessing would complicate the code
quite a bit) and clock faces in general don't differentiate between AM
and PM times. I guess that's why I'm leaning more towards the slider
approach - certainly less familiar than a clock face but feels very
comfortable nonetheless and I think I can find the real estate. I'll
probably implement it as a small button (maybe looking like a clock!)
that will popup a window with the sliders in it.
Either way, thanks a lot for the code.
Pete Haworth
On Feb 22, 2010, at 10:00 AM, [email protected]
wrote:
From: Scott Rossi <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Time entry
To: How to use Revolution <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed;
delsp=yes
Hi Pete:
FWIW, if you have a small amount of real estate for the time entry
control, a clock face is a lot more efficient than a slider.
Regardless, yes 48 is the number of 15 minute intervals. The other
thing you may need to adjust is the width of the slider base graphic
-- it's currently wide enough to evenly accommodate tick marks for
the
48 intervals.
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, UX Design
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
