I can answer the question of your vision myself? I asked you to share your vision, in simplest terms, without ambiguity, through a few examples. Instead you answer with more obfuscation. I can only think, after a certain point, that you don't really have a vision what you're after. And don't say I didn't ask or that I'm in need of a teacher to tell me what to think or how to behave. SImple questions deserve simple answers.
Mark On May 2, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Randall Lee Reetz wrote: > You can answer that question your self easly enough. Close your eyes, > imagine evolution doing what evolution does. Where will complexity handling > systems be in 10, 20, 100 years? The whole notion of sitting down at a > computer is hopelessly old-school. The better question really is "what is it > that systems want? Any systems. Humans are a system. Is it the shovel we > are after, or is it the ditch, is it water we want or the fruit it grows, is > it the fruit or the energy we receive, is it the energy or is it the use we > put that energy towards, what are these uses, what drives us towards them, > where is it all headed? Is any of this something that is best embodied in a > spread sheet or a web page or a slide show? aren't these notions simply the > result of the limitations our imaginations place upon the future as a result > of historical experience? The real question becomes, what do you want out of > life? What does life want? What is life? What will life be? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Swindell <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 3:58 PM > To: How to use Revolution <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue > > Randall, > > What do you want to see software do? Please be succinct. Give a handful of > examples of what you envision happening when you sit down at a computer. > Real terms. No philosophy. I'm not trying to disrespect you here, I just > don't fully comprehend what your vision is for software, and how that will > make the computing world (and world) a better place. > > Thanks, > Mark > > > > On May 2, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Randall Lee Reetz wrote: > >> Ok, but know that apple and adobe and microsoft are dealing with this issue >> in the context of these big-future projections. Google too. The old >> paradigm is well past its its viable life span and there is nothing but >> russian rockets left to heft us into place while we wait for the new. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Peter Haworth <[email protected]> >> Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 3:28 PM >> To: [email protected] > > > > [The entire original message is not included] > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
