[...]
NSString *documentsDirectory = [paths objectAtIndex:0];
while(!madeNewPath) {
imgPath = [documentsDirectory stringByAppendingPathComponent:[NSString
stringWithFormat:@"WhatThe%i.jpg",x]];
if([[NSFileManager defaultManager] fileExistsAtPath:imgPath]) x++; else
madeNewPath = TRUE;
}
[...]
restoredImg = [UIImage imageWithData:[NSData dataWithContentsOfFile:imgPath]];
On May 2, 2010, at 10:17 PM, Mark Swindell wrote:
> Randall,
>
> Like most people, I'm neither Galileo nor the Church. I sign my real name to
> my posts, and I asked you a real question hoping for a real answer... a
> simple, honest question about your vision for computing, to which you have no
> answer, only more masturbatory rhetoric, and the same name calling and
> juvenile inferences that only a few posts ago you so decried when it came
> your way. So, unless you wish to become honest and stop hiding inside your
> linguistic psychedelics, I give up. I'm not sure at this point that you'd
> recognize truth or honesty if it hit you upside the head with a two-by-four.
>
> Mark
>
> On May 2, 2010, at 5:56 PM, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:
>
>> Sad. Truth matters in all affairs. Good people can see through lies and
>> purposeful deceit. History will judge. Are you galileo or the church?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mark Swindell <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 4:45 PM
>> To: How to use Revolution <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
>>
>> I can answer the question of your vision myself? I asked you to share your
>> vision, in simplest terms, without ambiguity, through a few examples.
>> Instead you answer with more obfuscation. I can only think, after a certain
>> point, that you don't really have a vision what you're after. And don't say
>> I didn't ask or that I'm in need of a teacher to tell me what to think or
>> how to behave. SImple questions deserve simple answers.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>> On May 2, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:
>>
>>> You can answer that question your self easly enough. Close your eyes,
>>> imagine evolution doing what evolution does. Where will complexity
>>> handling systems be in 10, 20, 100 years? The whole notion of sitting down
>>> at a computer is hopelessly old-school. The better question really is
>>> "what is it that systems want? Any systems. Humans are a system. Is it
>>> the shovel we are after, or is it the ditch, is it water we want or the
>>> fruit it grows, is it the fruit or the energy we receive, is it the energy
>>> or is it the use we put that energy towards, what are these uses, what
>>> drives us towards them, where is it all headed? Is any of this something
>>> that is best embodied in a spread sheet or a web page or a slide show?
>>> aren't these notions simply the result of the limitations our imaginations
>>> place upon the future as a result of historical experience? The real
>>> question becomes, what do you want out of life?
>>
>>
>> [The entire original message is not included]
>> _______________________________________________
>> use-revolution mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
>> preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> [email protected]
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
