Yes, I have read it several times. But apple is grasping here. What matters is what they are motivated by (what is behind the rule). Apple is getting bad press and worse. They want a solution that doesn't cause a riot. So I ask again, what would it take to export C source? That way apple can keep its fingers in everything (i think that is what thay are after). And rev shouldn't care. Adobe does, but rev shouldn't. Win win win. Apple says providence but means access at the compiler stage. That is my bet. Anyone at rev asked jobs this yet?
-----Original Message----- From: Richard Gaskin <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 10:08 PM To: How to use Revolution <[email protected]> Subject: Re: How exactly does runrev for ipad/iphone work? Randall Reetz wrote: > But nobody has answered my proposal. Why not write an xtalk to C > source (not binary or byte code) translator? Now it's four times: <http://mail.runrev.com/pipermail/use-revolution/2010-May/139296.html> keyword: provenance -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Rev training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com Webzine for Rev developers: http://www.revjournal.com revJournal blog: http://revjournal.com/blog.irv _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
