Hello Chipp, Richard, Randall, ... Sorry Tom, I'm sorry to revive the debate, but, for me, everything is not clear... I make a supposition — unfortunaly it is a supposition :-( I am an expert with RevTalk and Objective C. I make a tool that allows me to write a project with RevTalk language. I use Interface Builder to create the interface. I click a "magic" button and all my work turns into a perfect Objective C code. I enter my new Objective C code (copy and paste) in Cocoa Xcode on my Macintosh and I start construct the application as if I type all with my little hands... How Apple can prove that I used the language RevTalk to "prototype" my code ? Am I in this case in violation of § 3.3.1 ? In absolute (towards contract), yes, but where are the proof ? If I act in this way, I don't see where is there problem... René
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
