On 28/07/2010 10:22, "Wilhelm Sanke" <[email protected]> wrote:
> CCs of this post are sent to [email protected] and [email protected]. > > There are about 10 or more (minor to critical) bugs associated with the > group object, which have cost me plenty of time and a huge amount of > frustation to get to the details of these bugs and eventually to find > out workarounds if possible. These bugs seem to be totally outside the > scope and interest of the RunRev team. > My bug report 8275 of Sept. 16, 2009, "Groups: Bugs and features ("last > group" broken)?", which listed 5 of these group bugs, is stiil shown as > "unconfirned" as of today - nearly 11 months later! > > If they should indeed have looked at the report and cannot replicate the > bugs, I would at least expect an organized attempt to communicate with > the bug reporter, maybe asking him for more information or a sample > stack etc.etc.. > As an active supporter and user of Revolution since its beginnings I > am of course aware of the difficulties and the multitude of tasks the > Rev team has to address with limited personal resources. But I think > there is an urgent need to re-organize the handling of bug reports and > the management of the so-called "Quality Control Center". To completely > disregard valuable feedback from motivated users is not the way to keep > up or build trust for Revolution and its developers. I agree. I have responded in more detail on this topic and on a number of other important points relating to the direction of the Rev platform on our revEnterprise improve-rev membership mailing list. Kind regards, Kevin Kevin Miller ~ [email protected] ~ http://www.runrev.com/ RunRev - Software construction for everyone _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
