Obligatory. Otherwise there is no vehicle for any other interaction. This 
was the basis for last week's thread, where it was discussed how to dig into 
a running process from outside that process. You cannot.

Fortunately, in this case the "wait" command is within the operating 
handler, and control can be delegated, and acquired, as needed.

Craig Newman

In a message dated 9/30/10 10:15:49 AM, [email protected] writes:


> If you DO use a repeat loop, the 'wait <time> with messages' is pretty 
> much
> obligatory right? So you can setup an exit strategy and so that pending
> messages (such as sends and dispatches) will still be processed, right?
> 
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to