On Sep 30, 2010, at 7:15 AM, Mike Bonner wrote: > If you DO use a repeat loop, the 'wait <time> with messages' is pretty much > obligatory right?
Have never used it but it seems like a good thing to include as a general housekeeping kind of thing. > So you can setup an exit strategy and so that pending > messages (such as sends and dispatches) will still be processed, right? I don't use send in time I just use immediate sends. Current handler halts until the send completes. From what I can see in the dos, dispatch is also an immediate thing. It blocks until it completes. Kee_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
