> (And actually, if you really wanted to be perfect, you might improve > it by multiplying the number of lines or items by a desired amount for > your random number parameter, so you have less chance of two lines > having the same random number and (I assume) remaining in the order > they originally were in the list.)
Or use some large number?
Dar Scott
Yeah! That's simpler. :-) _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
