curry writes: [snip]
> (And actually, if you really wanted to be perfect, you might improve > it by multiplying the number of lines or items by a desired amount for > your random number parameter, so you have less chance of two lines > having the same random number and (I assume) remaining in the order > they originally were in the list.)
===========
But then, you no longer have a randomized list... You now have a non-random function based on random.
miscdas _______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
