On Monday, December 8, 2003, at 12:03 PM, Stephen King wrote:
The way I got around it was to 'Send' more often than I needed (every 10
mSec in my case), then check the elapsed time between 'Send's against the
system clock to update my timer - Using 'Send' a bit like an interrupt. This
method worked fine, accurate to 0.01 seconds with no noticable overhead on
processing.
I agree. Always go to the clock for accurate timing. An alternative to the above procedure would be to adjust the delay specified in the send to target the end of the next period.
Dar Scott
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
