On Tuesday, December 9, 2003, at 12:26 AM, Stephen King wrote:
I have used this method as well, but found that it didn't work too well for
short time increments, in 10's of mSec as the Send message will only accept
integer values of mSec. So I went to the system clock instead.
Dynamically adjusting the Send delay worked Ok for me on longer delays
though.
That seems reasonable. Another approach is to get there early and wait for the time.
Another approach for timers is to make the display look as good as it can (based on the clock), but do the real timing some other way. That is, the display might update often, but the display at the event that stops the clock is exact. Well, close to it.
Dar scott
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
