Jim Hurley wrote: > I have been getting some strange results setting the heights of > graphic rectangles--programmatically. > > For example the following run from the msg box: > > put the height of grc 1 & return after results > set the height of grc 1 to (the height of grc 1) + 0.1 > put the height of grc 1 after results > put results > > Gives: > > 70 > 70 > > As it should. The addition of .1 to the height should have no > effect. Graphic 1 is a rectangle. > > But > > put the height of grc 1 & return after results > set the height of grc 1 to (the height of grc 1) - 0.1 > put the height of grc 1 after results > put results > > Gives: > > 70 > 69 > > Whereas it should give > > 70 > 70 > > Subtracting .0000001 from the height also gives > > 70 > 69 > > (The +.1 and -.1 arise from a variable determined from a calculation.) > > Mac OS 9, RR 2.1.2 > > If anyone can confirm this, I will Bugzilla it.
Is it a bug if it's rounding the subtraction to the nearest whole pixel? Would round(0.00001) give you what you're looking for? -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Media Corporation Developer of WebMerge: Publish any database on any Web site ___________________________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
