Those don't truly *hide* the field, in the sense that if you check to see if the mouse is in the region of the field it still turns out to be true, even if the field is not visible.
doug On 1/18/04 3:34 PM, "Phil Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a reason why you don't want to: > hide fld 1 > show fld 1 > > or alternately: > set the visible of fld 1 to false > set the visible of fld 1 to true > > Seems to me that's what the 'visible' property of objects is all about. > > Phil Davis > >> >> If I want to completely hide a field I have been setting it's rectangle >> temporarily to 0,0,0,0. This seems to work ok. Anybody see any >> problems with >> doing that - or can recommend a better way? >> >> Thanks, >> >> doug >> > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
