On 1/18/04 2:08 AM, "Doug Lerner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> If I want to completely hide a field I have been setting it's rectangle >>> temporarily to 0,0,0,0. This seems to work ok. Anybody see any >>> problems with >>> doing that - or can recommend a better way?
>> Is there a reason why you don't want to: >> hide fld 1 >> show fld 1 >> >> or alternately: >> set the visible of fld 1 to false >> set the visible of fld 1 to true >> >> Seems to me that's what the 'visible' property of objects is all about. > Those don't truly *hide* the field, in the sense that if you check to see if > the mouse is in the region of the field it still turns out to be true, even > if the field is not visible. How are you testing the mouse? When I use the following script and the field is hidden, the result is consistently false: put within(fld myField,the mouseLoc) Regards, Scott Rossi Creative Director Tactile Media, Development & Design ----- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.tactilemedia.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
