When I made a one-function standalone that just reported the systemVersion, I got what I expected i.e. 10.3.2 in OS X and 9.2.2 in Classic.
My apologies if I made anyone panic and I have now been reminded of my usual rule: check problems in isolation before reporting them.
Thanks to everyone for their usual helpfulness and suggestions - I'll now go and sit in the corner for a while....
Cheers, Sarah
On 16 Jan 2004, at 3:37 pm, Sarah Reichelt wrote:
From the TD...I'll do some more tests but I'm pretty sure this is wrong. I am still getting the OS X version number, not the Classic system folder version number. If my tests confirm this, I'll Bugzilla it.
Note: When running a Mac OS application in the Classic box on an OS X system, the systemVersion function returns the version number of the Classic system folder.
Maybe that is a hint somehow. I'm not sure how.
Cheers, Sarah
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
