Sorry everyone, there must be an error in some other part of my scripts :-(
When I made a one-function standalone that just reported the systemVersion, I got what I expected i.e. 10.3.2 in OS X and 9.2.2 in Classic.


My apologies if I made anyone panic and I have now been reminded of my usual rule: check problems in isolation before reporting them.

Thanks to everyone for their usual helpfulness and suggestions - I'll now go and sit in the corner for a while....

Cheers,
Sarah

On 16 Jan 2004, at 3:37 pm, Sarah Reichelt wrote:

From the TD...

Note: When running a Mac OS application in the Classic box on an OS X system, the systemVersion function returns the version number of the Classic system folder.

Maybe that is a hint somehow. I'm not sure how.

I'll do some more tests but I'm pretty sure this is wrong. I am still getting the OS X version number, not the Classic system folder version number. If my tests confirm this, I'll Bugzilla it.

Cheers,
Sarah

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution




_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to