Richard Gaskin wrote:

That's the focus of Geoff Moore's book "Crossing the Chasm", about how
successful software grows by understanding the different personality types
at play in different stages of growth.
I will check out the book.

Bean counters play an increasing
role as growth moves forward, and the supporting infrastructure (third-party
consultants, tools, books, magazine articles, etc.) indeed plays a key role
in shaping their perceptions.
Agreed.

<clipped other useful stuff.>

Heck, this thread got started by niggling over one line in an otherwise
four-star review.  That reviewer also wrote:

   All in all, no other software-development environment packs
   this much power and flexibility into such a simple package.
   You'll have to learn the Transcript language to make the most
   of Revolution, but the system is heroically well documented.
Yeah, I know the review was good, but one always hope for fully enlightened reviews. I should know better because I have submitted peer review journal papers and had one reviewer want to publish it and another not understand it to the point of asking questions that were directly answered in the paper! Unfortunately, the flip side of not fully informed reviews is that the authors come with a clear bias. For example, I have seen plenty of computer/programmer articles where the reviewer was not far removed financially etc from the product being reviewed. Oh well.

Later,

Michael Y

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by CENTRIC INTERNET SERVICES]

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to