From: Dan Shafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"It is a hazardeous way to compare Flash and Revolution ; but it is easy to explain "Revolution is superior to Flash beacuse Revolution can embedd Flash"." Reminds me of the old religious language wars between Prolog and LISP. The LISPers always thought they could win the battle by saying, smugly, "You could write Prolog in LISP but you could never write LISP in Prolog." I always wanted to shout, "But I don't *want* to write a freaking computer language!" To me, a linkage between Transcript and JavaScript that would allow me to wrapper calls to media objects in my favorite language (Transcript) would be more beneficial than the ability to embed Flash stuff in Rev.
Anyway i am glad that Rev can embedd vector graphic animation through altBrowser.dll, even if a native support could be better (with params passed from Flash to Rev as they arre passed from Flash to JavaScript).
"Revolution appears today as the tool for the Macintosh community."
I thought Kevin dealt well with that one the other day. If anyone has a perception that Rev is a Mac tool, there's not much that can be done to help them. The MacWorld (UK?) reviewer who said that obviously had spent little or no time writing the review. Nothing at RunRev's Web site, in their marketing or, anywhere else that I've seen conveys that message.
As far as multimedia is concerned, Revolution as a native support for Quicktime, clearly an Apple technology. Windows and Linux users are not so happy...
Claude _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
