Before I "trolled" this list again (sorry, couldn't resist)
Just curious: did someone throw the tired "troll" accusation your way? It's so overused across Internet discussions that in most cases I've come across it says far darker things about the accuser's inability to see fresh information as fresh than it does about the intentions of the accused.
> I asked RunRev whether I may sell it. Yes, I may.
This is common for software licenses, as European lawcourts have made it clear that Microsoft can not forbid people to resell their Windows license. If Microsoft cannot, how could someone else ;-)
Well, other companies aren't required to pay $603 million in penalties for crimes against the public, so the rules sometimes vary with Miocrosoft. ;)
But seriously, thank you for the clarification. It's probably useful to know for US readers because the environment here in the States is far more litigious and restrictive. Your clarification will help potential buyers here feel more comfortable with a license agreement that opens by referring to itself as "non-transferrable" without also mentioning that such a restriction doesn't apply in the EU.
The license was bought on March, 8th 2004. So it is "brand new", bought for Version 2.1.2 and, according to the license text, usable for one bugfix (erm, upgrade).
Sounds like a good deal.
-- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Media Corporation ___________________________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
