This doesn't seem efficient. If I already have a large array (in my case 1000000 rows and only 1 column) then if I want [50000,1] to [134000,1] into a new array looping seems like I'm not really taking advantage of what already exists in memory (in my case).
...
I am stuck with arrays but I really would like to have a faster solution... unless there is something that I'm missing??
What exactly are you trying to do with a million rows in an array? It may be that this is a weakness of Rev's array being associative: they are not stored in numeric order under the hood, so it's not trivial to pull out a range...
- Brian
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
