I agree. It's frustrating to have the rules change all the time. I think if we had a clear description of the problem then we would get a truer comparison between the development environments. One thing that might help would be to have expected output as part of the test.
I have my doubts about even the new test data as it seems to be a pointless exercise and would be far more enjoyable to actually read the book ;-) In the end no matter what development environment you choose it's application design that's the key. Using a database back end like Valentina this entire problem could likely be cut down to one SQL statement. Maintaining text metadata in the background would likely cut the problem down to under 500 milliseconds. Maintaining search phrase metadata could cut it down even more. It's all a matter of design and knowing your application requirements. We can't change the fact that RB has a faster substring searcher than Rev but we can make that fact irrelevant. Cheers Monte _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
