On Wednesday, April 21, 2004, at 08:40 AM, Frank Leahy wrote:
There's no reason that offset(), "is in", and "contains" shouldn't all be
1) the same speed, and
I agree for 'is in' and 'contains'. (I think 'contains' does an extra copy.)
However, offset() provides position info. I can't think of a fast method that is great for 'is in' that cannot also provide position info quickly, but that does not mean someone else can't.
p.s. And split() could be sped up at the same time...
Yeah. For me, the ability to pass arrays with send and the feature of nested arrays will allow me to avoid split. When and if they come.
Dar Scott
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
