Wouter wrote:
I'm not convinced. The description above requires that a polygon must
meet
one or other of the two conditions - and many "obvious" polygons will not
satisfy either condition. No need to invoke the opacity of the polygon.
Your original example had a non-blank last line containing a point which
was not a duplicate of the first point - therefore was neither an open
nor a closed polygon.
This is the difference in looking at things.
Is it the engine that should be conform to the description or is it the
description that should be conform to the engine?
I vote for whichever one gives the developer the greater range of options.
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media Corporation
___________________________________________________
Rev tools and more: http://www.fourthworld.com/rev
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
