Recently, "Alex Tweedly" wrote: >> I agree that the interaction of closed-ness with the opacity is awkward, >> but I cannot consider it a real bug. >> The improvement would be to add another property that governs open- or >> closed-ness. >> And use the opacity for the enclosed regions of the polygon to be filled >> or not. > > I see it as a real bug. If I create a 20-sided opaque polygon, with the > first point not being duplicated at the end, that produces a filled shape, > with the last edge not drawn. Then I add a blank line at the other side > (i.e. between points 10 and 11) of the polygon, and suddenly the last edge > becomes drawn. Surely that's a bug ?
This may just be the IDE trying to be helpful (in which case it may be a bug). But in any case, you might try checking points via script/answer to verify point information. FWIW, I do agree that a "closed-ness" property seems unnecessary (as long as setting points is not broken). In addition to Geoff Canyon's amazing asteroids recreation that employs a single polygon graphic, you might want to take a look at the Tutti3D example available in our media panel. Enter the following in your message box and scroll down to Tutti3D: go url "http://www.tactilemedia.com/tmpanel.rev"; Regards, Scott Rossi Creative Director Tactile Media, Multimedia & Design ----- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.tactilemedia.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
