Mark Wieder wrote:
Richard-

It's been years since I've used ToolBook, and I no longer remember the
syntax for doing these things, so I went and took a look at the new
web site:

http://www.sumtotalsystems.com/toolbook/demos/flash/unsupported/unsupported.html

So far I'm not impressed.

I'm not suggesting anyone use ToolBook; Rev is smaller, faster, and even the Enterprise version costs less than half as much so there would be no need.


My only point is that if we're going to explore ways to add optional type declarations to the language we don't need to reinvent that wheel.

Extra bonus points: if we use the long-established conventions ToolBook already has for this, it makes it that much easier for those users to switch to Rev if they're as impressed by the new owners as you are. ;)

--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Media Corporation
 ___________________________________________________________
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]       http://www.FourthWorld.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to