Troy- Tuesday, August 10, 2004, 8:19:26 AM, you wrote:
TR> I'm only interested in seeing Rev have the capacity to do even more TR> than it can currently do. I really don't care what means that is TR> through, only that it shouldn't involve a C compiler. It should tap TR> into some library of tools which is being continuously added to, and is TR> designed for the average developer to tie into their projects. Yes - this is exactly the point of a generic extensibility mechanism. One analogy that comes to mind is music software, where VST plugins and the like are supported by many different applications without the users having to write a new connecting library for each new plugin. -- -Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
