Does your implementation support *nix platforms?
-==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=- Disclaimer: Any resemblance between the above views and those of my employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely coincidental. Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic. The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of the reader is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient. (A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the scope of this article.) --- On Tue 08/10, Mark Wieder < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: From: Mark Wieder [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:44:52 -0700 Subject: Re: ActiveX and RR K-<br><br>Tuesday, August 10, 2004, 4:41:47 AM, you wrote:<br><br>K> I believe the focus on ActiveX is a bit short sighted once RR<br>K> can make native OS calls (GetProcAddress, LoadLibrary ...) ActiveX,<br><br>I did the LoadLibrary and GetProcAddress external calls some time ago,<br>but without engine support they aren't that useful by themselves.<br><br>-- <br>-Mark Wieder<br> [EMAIL PROTECTED]<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>use-revolution mailing list<br>[EMAIL PROTECTED]<br>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution<br> _______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
