> > > There are some advantages, since "offset" already exists and so > "offsets" leverages off developer knowledge of that function. The > syntax is also cleaner than the existing "offset" syntax, which has > been a rough spot ever since HyperTalk 1.0, so making the obvious > extension to the offset function might not be a bad idea. This could > also be extended to word offsets, item offsets, and line offsets > matching the current "offset" function variants. > --
Another interesting extension would be to combine various offsets, for instance to be able with 1 single command to get the lineoffset and itemoffset of an element inside a variable containing multiple lines with multiple items in each... JB _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
