On Sunday, August 22, 2004, at 01:25 PM, Alex Tweedly wrote:
Nevertheless, returning a comma-separated list would be much nicer than an array.
or, as in most return values, a simple comma-delimited list: 1,10,20.
-- Alex.
Interesting choice. An array could be one split away if you needed it.
So let's say that you have hundreds of points either in an array or comma delimited. What would be the fastest way to get the value of the item just less than 100 in this following example?
1, 34, 67, 99, 109, 121, 133, 144, 155, (answer = item 4) -- 99
Would I have to loop through each one checking each during a repeat for the last item less-than 100 or is there a faster way to get the value in item 4. Every time I can drop a repeat loop seems to be a way to optimize the result based on speed issues.
Mark
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
